The UNREAL climate change thread
+4
senorita
Constance
Andy
eddie
8 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
It's snowing in my room all you monkey dicks so I'm gonna have to kill the rest of ya still standing.
senorita- Posts : 362
Join date : 2012-07-11
Age : 27
Location : makgadikgadi pan
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
I have found climate change is a mystery to most of the public, they think it just means global warming !!!!!
Guest- Guest
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
Pinz is a trouble man. He's carrying on a debate here that is should be having somewhere else with someone that may or may not be reading along here. Certainly, Pinz is infected. Good...
senorita- Posts : 362
Join date : 2012-07-11
Age : 27
Location : makgadikgadi pan
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
There is nothing wrong with the great man.senorita panties wrote:Pinz is a trouble man. He's carrying on a debate here that is should be having somewhere else with someone that may or may not be reading along here. Certainly, Pinz is infected. Good...
Guest- Guest
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
I am neither . I am a believer in clamate change.pinhedz wrote:Is Doc a skeptic--or a DENIER.
Guest- Guest
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
Is this discussion taking place at the moment, pinhedz?
blue moon- Posts : 709
Join date : 2012-08-03
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
Have to read the whole thread, and in order... and contrast it with I don't know what (?) before deciding if pinhedz is just a lunatic posting on the internet. I believe he wouldn't bring all this into attention just for the joy of saying the opposite of what we're mostly told, but it sounds sooo unheard to my ears that I can't just go and believe the pinhedz.
Should knowing if scientists opinion of apparently agreement has come clean to us, general "public", be harder than becoming a scientist ourselves?
or is it that that last part of the green line wants so much to be perpendicular that indeed if that belongs to the last decades (can't see that in the graphic ) it should show completely perpendicular and maybe there were times like this but they were just variations that have no real impact in the graphic and can't show if we put it with hundreds of thousands of years?
edit: wait I just noticed you wrote 500 million years
Should knowing if scientists opinion of apparently agreement has come clean to us, general "public", be harder than becoming a scientist ourselves?
or is it that that last part of the green line wants so much to be perpendicular that indeed if that belongs to the last decades (can't see that in the graphic ) it should show completely perpendicular and maybe there were times like this but they were just variations that have no real impact in the graphic and can't show if we put it with hundreds of thousands of years?
edit: wait I just noticed you wrote 500 million years
this and that- Posts : 316
Join date : 2012-10-29
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
first response I get is that 500 million years ago earth was "another" planet earth and can't apply
this and that- Posts : 316
Join date : 2012-10-29
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
in the graph above of 22000 years you can see CO2 follows the temperature, just a bit later. But a bit later looks at least like 200 years. What made the CO2 follow the temperature increase with a delay of 200 years (or more), time of reaction or what's that- the sea warming up , waiting for a real change (not just a variation that would recover) as to make the effort of CO2 worth it? Since the CO2 is growing so fast is that why it is expected that the delay of temperature following the CO2 increase will be little? Or is it that temperature, despite all, is more submissive?
oh, wait. Maybe it's not 200 years, if we look closer, only for the last 10 thousand years we can see I don't understand anything
This thread needs an index
oh, wait. Maybe it's not 200 years, if we look closer, only for the last 10 thousand years we can see I don't understand anything
pinhedz wrote:This could be very confusing to folks that are used to looking back only a few hundred years. Have temperature and CO2 really been moving in opposite directions for the last 10,000 years?
Folks might think that contradicts what they've been hearing, but it really doesn't.
This thread needs an index
this and that- Posts : 316
Join date : 2012-10-29
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
My good feline friend, supermabel1, tells me (relying again on the flippin' interwebs! ) that:pinhedz wrote:Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.
Isn't Mabel aka Felix? Or do I remember that wrong?Noah forgot to record the temperature the year the Mediterranean Sea broke through the Bosphorus.supermabel1 wrote:2012 was the wettest in England (though not in the UK generally) since records began, whenever that was.So what year was the thermometer invented?supermabel1 wrote:Hah! Thermometer gone! :mrgreen:
The thermometer was invented by Galileo Galilei in 1593. His thermometer consisted of water in a glass bulb; the water moved up and down the bulb as the temperature changed.
The sealed thermometer was invented in 1641 by the Grand Duke Ferdinand II. He used a glass tube containing alcohol, which freezes well below the freezing point of water (alcohol freezes at -175°F=-115°C). He sealed the tube to exclude the influence of air pressure.
Mercury was later substituted for the alcohol, and then Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit (1686-1736), a German physicist, used mercury plus a chemical solution that kept the mercury from sticking to the tube of the thermometer (in 1714). Fahrenheit also expanded the thermometer's scale (in 1724); on his scale, the temperature of boiling water is 212°F and the freezing point of water is 32°F.
Anders Celsius, a Swedish astronomer, invented the Celsius (or Centigrade) scale in 1742, putting the freezing point of water at 0° and the boiling point at 100°.
The important bit, underlined, possibly answers the pinhedz' question, sez supermabel1.
felix- cool cat - mrkgnao!
- Posts : 836
Join date : 2011-04-11
Location : see the chicken?
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
.
Last edited by this on Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:12 am; edited 1 time in total
this and that- Posts : 316
Join date : 2012-10-29
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
.
Last edited by b on Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
On "Brains, Know-How and Native Intelligence" the Medicine Man who doesn't want to check his illness with modern world doctors realises it's pride, or that the illness finds its way in thatYakima Canutt wrote:LBJ said he knew he lost Vietnam when Cronkite decided the war was dumb, same way professor pineapple must concede defeet now that he has lost Shep Smith and thereby Amrica's heart-land. Don't matter if the Viet-Kong are stinky or if Man-Made Change is myth, the battle is lost, and only Sisyphus Quixotes's would stay and tilt instead of doing something more purposeful like Global TM actualization.
yoder- Posts : 175
Join date : 2014-05-24
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
sitting is the new smoking took me to a forum of smoking fetishists
yoder- Posts : 175
Join date : 2014-05-24
Re: The UNREAL climate change thread
Last edited by d e on Thu Nov 26, 2015 3:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest- Guest
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|